No. 22-6679
Debra Sauer v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-dismissal legal-claims ninth-circuit patent standing takings
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (from Petition)
Ay€. c^ncf ard CTlrcuii"
decisions \v\ron-Pl \ el~ -Yhe.
wVcYv dismissed7"Ct~ oiec\S\oov'f
prev se - K\
■Tlicr 6v/ifk
•f <4e.c\Sior^ (ajKicU dIHeJ lauj m con
iS--twfC irc^'
?W\\ -S S€_cA c^s-e. . vO^A
9 «se..See m
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Aveand and the Ut Cieecit decisions conflict with the Circuit decision which dismissed my case?
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent Aaron Grossman to respond filed.
2023-02-02
Waiver of right of respondents City of Chicago, Olivia Stovall, and Scott Rogus to respond filed.
2023-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron Grossman
Joshua G. Vincent — Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Respondent
City of Chicago, Olivia Stovall, and Scott Rogus
Julian N. Henriques Jr. — City of Chicago, Respondent
Debra Sauer
Debra Sauer — Petitioner