No. 22-6679
Debra Sauer v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-dismissal legal-claims ninth-circuit patent standing takings
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Aveand and the Ut Cieecit decisions conflict with the Circuit decision which dismissed my case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ave the And and the Ut Cieecit decisions wm conFlich with the ? Cweuit Aecisiory cue hismissed 2? my Case * TVs settled law iY) conf lich with the 7™ Ciccurt decision which dismissed om conse? Please See ™ SKaemeet 5 +he Case. a/ ie 3 3
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent Aaron Grossman to respond filed.
2023-02-02
Waiver of right of respondents City of Chicago, Olivia Stovall, and Scott Rogus to respond filed.
2023-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron Grossman
Joshua G. Vincent — Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Respondent
Joshua G. Vincent — Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Respondent
City of Chicago, Olivia Stovall, and Scott Rogus
Julian N. Henriques Jr. — City of Chicago, Respondent
Julian N. Henriques Jr. — City of Chicago, Respondent