No. 22-6681
Shane Swindall Chambers v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actus-reus constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence jury-instructions mens-rea modus-operandi other-acts-evidence trial-court
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner was deprived of due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED f ZI. WHETHER PETTIONER WAS DEPRIVED oF Mis LIBERTY wwitdour FIRST THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE Fife TRIAL COURT AlLCowED PROSECUTION FS CREATE A FALSE MeODUS OPERAMDI REQUIRED Fo ADMIT OWJER AcTS EVIDENCE, AND WHERE THAT EVIDENCE WAS USED TS ESTABLISH AéTus REUS — THE CRIME ITSELF. Pb boner answers, “yes ~ ‘ The Mrchigan Court of Appeals ansivers , no% The US. Courd of Appeals answers, “ne!
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2022-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Shane S. Chambers
Shane Swindall Chambers — Petitioner