No. 22-6681

Shane Swindall Chambers v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actus-reus constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence jury-instructions mens-rea modus-operandi other-acts-evidence trial-court
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner was deprived of due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED f ZI. WHETHER PETTIONER WAS DEPRIVED oF Mis LIBERTY wwitdour FIRST THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW WHERE Fife TRIAL COURT AlLCowED PROSECUTION FS CREATE A FALSE MeODUS OPERAMDI REQUIRED Fo ADMIT OWJER AcTS EVIDENCE, AND WHERE THAT EVIDENCE WAS USED TS ESTABLISH AéTus REUS — THE CRIME ITSELF. Pb boner answers, “yes ~ ‘ The Mrchigan Court of Appeals ansivers , no% The US. Courd of Appeals answers, “ne!

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2022-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)

Attorneys

Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Shane S. Chambers
Shane Swindall Chambers — Petitioner