Whether the FDIC's denial of FOIA coverage for theft, robbery or embezzlement of the Byline Bank violates the separation of powers doctrine

No question identified. : TRULINCS 22712424 JOHNSTON, ANDREW J Unit: TCP-C-A 293 U.S. Constitution, Separation of Powers : . CASES United States v. Brunson, 907 F.2d 117, 119 (CA10 1990) : United States v. Davis, 735 F.3d 194, 199-201 (CA5 2013) : United States v. Harris, 108 F.3d 1107, 1109 (CA9 1997) ' United States v. Kluver, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29302 (CA8 2000) United States v. Mojica-Baez, 229 F.3d 292, 299 (CA1 2000) United States v. Peay, 972 F.2d 71, 75 (CA4 1992) : United States v. Robinson, 389 F.3d 582, 594 (CA6 2004) United States v. Sliker, 751 F.2d 477, 484 (CA2 1984) : United States v. Spinello, 265 F.3d 150, 158 (CA3 2001) . United States v. Watts, 256 F.3d 630, 634 (CA7 2001) West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587 (2022) STATUTES C 5 U.S.C. Section 552, et seq. : 18 U.S.C. Section 2113, et seq. 18 U.S.C. Section 3231 OTHER Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b)(2) Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 Colum. L. Rev. 573, 583 (1984) STATEMENT OF THE FACTS/CASE On December 8, 2021, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued a written statement in response to petitioner's request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Section 552, et seq., stating it did not provide insurance coverage for "theft, robbery or embezzlement" of the Byline Bank. See,