No. 22-6707

Alfred E. Caraffa v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-06
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims damages due-process habeas-corpus immunity ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief procedural-default standing state-court-review
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the federal district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims as unconstitutional acts done within the court's jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Q Ave Gederal Misteicl Gourk dex Unconatutionel Act&) clone in The Junisdicdion of tha ¢ Courtresm? D) Ace Ged eral Tudges wosalude Touunity;’ | Otte cred even Vf We Sedge, TS 4 CCUSe oF Acting Melt ciously ond Corrup tly” < 3) Ave Led ered Dud es Absolute Temunidy attached even if Yeo edge males Ave Crests of Let oc WOE ed bree Quoted IN CareGve \y.V-S_A. Kevsey Jed os 460507 4\Ts Ss U_-s-c 8435S Avelid end Comaivrtionel Lewvt &S ws VN AGLO WLAAGOSSF cacefE V.UESA: 5) Liat MA \ces Ac th far Condlit anys of Con inne eat UriN N Unconsitu TONe Azone NST ORIN ony Cus qud&ed iN BME Coey edn ww 4A60S°7) eS ¢ 4 _of YF toe Mus ad j AD Cb | realy | py 2 p pS = D Io e (el ie o ee 6 , S a f “nk E Pb aa cd a G \ “Re as oo le) | We Y ie Fy (fe Fok | ue Bie) Fata yee | | ee gS aE er |e 2 (0 S| ae NB z AAs x Z0°6!) ee Pek 3 Ree | SB Phe be L 6 < —F, @ 4 an > aon Oo | lbp NEE. PUL Ee) ee ‘ph Pp Sy > s| | Ble ke , 5: . ; aL. AMR | | eee oP Rs | i = E ) cr | : g, O|* 74 ) Cons Any Uncoandite ke ma hele oe _ Se osdive” be dens} cd consiludions bon — Rrahts oncl Cptur leqes Awe bs ishher . x tive! Con dabionatly Iw —_Custady Ioersss 2 DB Ans Uncomsittuttoane| Acceiopsmant is Ans feinoleu symaltera: r __ ee Fels te Slate q clatw”S 73) ance ) VA ek Webees LEC Gus ys led. __¢ : Gard by Whe court ons its ABN _ en | thaw | Ass Bille colachy hnaeeas cose) Also ) Td) Con Sechign JUS GF AUSC. — Be used 45 Rand a osetson with An “onde Sal Cans cigs Seer segle fiplice —— gsi Amendment Ricks te the Peon I <d Co) Some ot Cn Lee eee ee , Questor Sresenshed GS) Maes Teaminent. damaee’” Under _ US. < Seedhwn 1915 Ape\ _ te cr lids alve:s iS | — yi acho TN : a eas SNE Os Sec acel —Qt LC) Dw Uncons shea Tosser Cans rettynS. ave 9, Hues limitation tS be a _— Commbideclions. | Action $ __ TF) OW Candtijeutions Pott S, Pru leqes — and Tamuailtves ZYD'IKE 3) C teh “in offhs ee Capact Eesti rse +o StQn ATieve ce under We Pottlton C fase, BeCuurre ee. —gSivesce 3s cloth the Actomtss of _ etic: , Ny Ah Goulet OEY BT oF AF ok aD

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2023)

Attorneys

Alfred Caraffa
Alfred Erik Caraffa — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent