No. 22-6710
David Wekesa v. United States Attorney, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 8-usc-1226c civil-rights due-process immigration-detention judicial-review mandatory-detention procedural-protections reasonableness-of-detention statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process mandates procedural protections during lengthy periods of mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether due process mandates procedural protections during lengthy periods of mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). 2. How long does detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) need to be before an inquiry into the reasonableness of the detention can be conducted? LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-19
Brief of respondents United States Attorney, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 19, 2023.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 19, 2023 to May 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-20
Response Requested. (Due April 19, 2023)
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent Federal respondents to respond filed.
2023-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Federal respondents
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent