Donnell Bledsoe v. Mark Zuckerberg, et al.
Whether the plaintiffs' First Amendment rights were violated by Facebook's surveillance of their religious posts about UFOs
No question identified. : why Ca the : QUESTION(S) a “pucrerbeny paid FaceBook With tneie “ cucssooke CTA Surveilldvce. Ewbeverheon pve aan’ Zug prerrong The planet S religous Post of UFOS Spacsuio WtOsOs Jet are. Un disurmable fo The wWurwnt EKO of The anege akyrean Soeieka. TwId acrid Pd {ure Aendendhanh 'S VU solute Lue plamtehFs 42T amend mert rails. Please eV tess) Plambtt's metion te File Lo dag man Exeo) ¥ Mag Br a ae Theve dine sugkeces coc ered undisputed yrpEe'S eve< oo at Uco's /slmetine CRUQI on Ui0S2 4 Oamerd, We deferdastS Mack . — Zutkecberr, Aoents of The Fiacebeok Cr A Program Are WYying te Cendof& The olamtte's ul FO J Stee (0 —PIROuser..