No. 22-6717

Vontez Scales, aka Tez v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender categorical-approach circuit-split civil-rights controlled-substance criminal-law delivery-definition due-process sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-03-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether prior convictions for inchoate offenses involving 'delivery' of controlled substances, where the state statute includes 'attempted transfer' as a means, qualify as 'controlled substance offenses' under the Sentencing Guidelines

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The battle lines are clearly drawn, with the circuits split and without | this court's intervention the debate regarding inchoate offenses are controlled substance offenses when the State crime concerns "delivery" where its means cover attempts. The statute at issue, Section 780-1 13(a)(30), has as an element "delivery" which includes as a means, "attempted transfer." The Third Circuit in Dawson, Below, says it is a controlled substance, while Campbell court finds an identical West Virginia statute is not a controlled substance offense. Should this Court grant certiorari to resolve this hot button issue which courts are split on? The only answer is yes.

Docket Entries

2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2023)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Vontez Scales
Vontez Scales — Petitioner
Vontez Scales — Petitioner