No. 22-6718

Justin Stabler v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-3553 abuse-of-discretion alcohol-consumption criminal-sentencing electronic-searches section-3553a sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-03-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 120-month sentence is substantively unreasonable

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) | Whether the 120-month sentence ordered by the district court is substantively unreasonable because, among other reasons, the Guidelines sentencing range was 46 to 57 months in prison. 2) | Whether the district court abused its discretion by ordering the following two special conditions of supervised release: a) requiring Mr. Stabler to submit his electronic communication devices to searches; and b) requiring him to refrain from consuming alcohol. ii

Docket Entries

2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2023)

Attorneys

Justin Stabler
Michael Scott — Petitioner
Michael Scott — Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent