Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the case without allowing the plaintiff to present evidence, in violation of the plaintiff's constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ]. Question of Law 2. Question of Fact ; . The lower Courts have not explained their reasoning of written law, or statue why the Plaintiff was not allowed to submit evidence. | present this same question to this Court, the highest Court What Law or Statue prohibits a Court at any level from accepting evidence if it was not submitted to the Court at the time the complaint was filed? : e Rule 103 Rulings and Evidence (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and: (2) if the ruling excludes evidence, a party informs the court of its substance by an offer of proof, unless the substance was apparent from the context. : &. Based on this Rule Why Did the Lower Courts not apply this Rule and allow the evidence? b. The Plaintiff/Appellant was instructed by the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia at the time of filing the first complaint that there would be time to present the evidence during Discovery which never happened. The case was transferred to Maryland and then dismissed because the evidence. was not present. The amount of evidence that the Plaintiff has is well over 500 pages and would have ballooned the page count. Plaintiff is ProSe and after being told that she could present the evidence at a later time, she waited for that time to come io present to do so. That time never came. It is the Plaintiff Constitutional right for the Plaintiff to be able to present to the Court the evidence to prove the allegations that she has brought before the Court of a violation of her civil rights and discrimination. The Courts would then have the opportunity to review the evidence regarding each allegation, afterwards a decision can be rendered by the Court on whether to allow the case to be reopened and moved to trial or that the case remain in a dismissed status. Not allowing this case to be reopened causes 4 harm not just to the Appellant but also to the public who seek justice through the Judicial system and expect justice, Not allowing this case to be properly, and evidence reviewed emboldens the Defendant to continue on a path of wrongdoing — as well as causes loss of trust of the Judicial system. (Plaintiff feel that the Courts have not given her the opportunity to present her case and that this case has been mishandied on purpose because she is prose. The Appeals Court did not provide a statement on what it was that they were affirming. c. When was the Plaintiff/A ppellant supposedly to submit the evidence if Discovery had not taken place yet? Comell Law Civil, Procedure and Wex Law states that the process for civil lawsuit is: Filing of the complaint, Pleadings, Discovery, Trial, and Appeal. If this is the process to Civil complaints, then why was the case allowed to be dismissed if Discovery had not taken place to see what evidence both Parties have within their possession? The case was dismissed not because of the Merit of the allegations but because there was no evidence. If the case was meritless, the case would have been : dismissed upon filing the case in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia. The Judge reviewed ang allowed the case to continue defeating the government’s motion te dismiss. There is merit with this ease. The case was wrongfully dismissed. ¢. What is the Court's standing regarding the violation ofa person’s civil rights which isa violation of federal law and the Constitution? 5