No. 22-6730
Pabeel Narvaez-Gomez v. United States
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review precedent precedent-analysis sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres U. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-03-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 10, 2023.
2023-03-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 10, 2023 to May 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 10, 2023.
2023-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2023 to April 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Pabeel Narvaez-Gomez
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent