No. 22-6731
Lamon Demetrus Wright v. United States
Tags: confrontation confrontation-rights due-process evidence-admissibility federal-courts good-cause good-cause-standard hearsay hearsay-reliability reliability supervised-release
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What manner of hearsay should be considered 'reliable' when federal courts decide whether the government has established 'good cause' to deny confrontation in a supervised release revocation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED What manner of hearsay should be considered “reliable” when federal courts decide whether the government has established “good cause” to deny confrontation in a supervised release revocation? i
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-08
Reply of petitioner Lamon Demetrus Wright filed.
2023-04-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 28, 2023.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2023 to April 28, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-27
Response Requested. (Due March 29, 2023)
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent