No. 22-6732
David Alvarado-Rios v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-sentencing judicial-discretion presumption-of-reasonableness rita-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does a defendant who challenges the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence rebut an appellate presumption of reasonableness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW How does a defendant who challenges the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence rebut an appellate presumption of reasonableness of the type recognized in Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007).
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2023)
Attorneys
David Alvarado-Rios
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent