Whether the listed state and federal court actions are parallel to any legally invoked criminal investigation or prosecution stemming from crimes reported inside and around the listed cases and whether those listed cases should be released from any hold placed on them for abandonment: a failure to prosecute

Questions Presented 1: Whether the listed state and federal court actions are parallel to any legally invoked criminal investigation of prosecution stemming from crimes reported inside and around the listed cases and whether those listed cases should be released from | any hold placed on them for abandonment: a failure to prosecute. 2: Whether civil courts reporting crimes taking place against them, and the courts that maintain jurisdiction over them should be ordered to publicly complete the process of the within-cases, given no “common facts, no common parties and no common : relationship to the crimes committed against the respective courts: plus the reasons set forth herein. 3: What constitutes censorship on the Internet? 4: What is protected speech regarding the Judicial Branch? If what a court says is not protected speech ' nothing can be protected speech. A court ordering . freedom of speech could be silenced if the court's product is not protected speech. in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux. On a Petition of Original Emergency Jurisdiction for a Writ of Procedendo and a Writ of Mandamus under the All Writs Act, to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Arizona Superior Court of Pinal County, Arizona. Pinal County, Arizona. 4 oo ll