No. 22-6736
Justin D. Martin v. United States
Relisted (8)IFP
Tags: acquittal criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment judicial-discretion jury-acquittal jury-trial sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 8 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant's sentence on conduct for which a jury has acquitted the defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct for which a jury has acquitted the defendant? 2
Docket Entries
2023-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-09
Rescheduled.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-25
Reply of petitioner Justin Martin filed. (Distributed)
2023-04-12
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-03-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 12, 2023.
2023-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 13, 2023 to April 12, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Justin Martin
Jeffrey P. Nunnari — Jeffrey P. Nunnari, Esq., Petitioner
Jeffrey P. Nunnari — Jeffrey P. Nunnari, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent