No. 22-6737

John Edward Butler v. North Carolina

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2023-02-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-justice due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection parole sentencing
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and Eighth Amendment were violated by North Carolina's Mutual Consent Parole Program that made him ineligible for parole review every three years

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Volation OFAN Feb Homer CAG Fi YP U,5,.L; 81983) 45 well as Sig and Four 9) Er'gls Olso,in HeENth hryendm est, Comtain bue Process Claas e & North Caroltwa Lon St, Are aud See andthe Arwetidwrerct ang d | th RUS ua rife DB eon Poles HOWeVEL 2 ViolaHoN, to Of Now Carolin a, 8/8) For Ae General Assembly Parte OF Ruby i? prove Commissiaul, Me North Carolina DeCHANGE fay.) MOONY Md E CoverNor Mike Baer Degree ONE Comp BON Rae Se rrheaiciig het Mund erp Favole, to EVEL +h oe fer role, Owe Veal Come up” ighhed INTO Low House aN AY9 Low loli [D008 Governor ys Povol'€ reviews Roy. ome nit ee Head the Prequciuc, denree Murder oF secotud-dennee rc convicted off J, murder iit { nat rns oPRenders who are re ‘Bevause oF ppibecanwe eligi ble forpetoe SOE every three yens Was i+ Aviolation elie U.4, Conce! Eve) in hig Fave hak d Tene Soups sae ree $5-48/0 br ainsi Na WH osen WAS H 4 Ulolaton ofdehentdant on Ped fre HONS deohonge: Awuondment hight othe U5, Lonstiettory ise pr fourteenth i Stabe to de rtroyed MA Fouw CriKe Geen Menor oi’ ce P POrtioeuth Delpy Was + aVlolation oPine pretthioner Ctl Hal, Pursuaatte4a Ud. 6, P1994, 85 WAS Eights ar oy eth Avene oasate buy. Fretes Lanse s\2o ong natteie ran aud Séc, ery Di ett reeTa nee elal Biae-7 Question (6) PRESENTED V Was ‘+ @ Violatoal of the DeReai lant /. Slo ni St Peg t p he ; iin i . i Z Hote: . tn _ tow Mobts Sunn, BiQb Feiobt andthe Bu rtareesy Ameadohts ! i O Neth Pare tina 62Sé'cn Joot= Hal Pei i lal 312) S142 B= 268, Mutual doveetareit Parole Prog raha —— SEC Tien lL 7. a7 30F, of) ait Fh nes bet 2 ty if j Pal : ty BD: j Ateve 1 Ate tar bl j i i 4 _by peap be (ofPendens Hhat Mot eligible-R nthis Piroshan 1 a Ndnae Sich te nn scetthe/h 80% the Senate dsld Heuse PR. _. Ss it APD} P oe a . S > a Lee S ZG ) 22% PELE =m FUDFO aA AL GAetio Qe "Li " Sy fj i Mitr and er C) BNE DMiston oO Adu Lonrecton Asses sraeut Resuls (see. idea Cha ved ) Pin Sani Work } beg aid Fede at Obi ? VIEW WiGS + Oo Votntaw Violator ofthe Petiowe, LL 3 Fonst'OAL ors oS $47 Du 7 Btn, ch, Bre bth cide Pau rth ; Mot he Ai Loured, tobe at his Parole beads ‘ie ? Tha Ket win i i a, Ff & t : eure . On So nase Han pe te wide leit eS i wid tit K Obeutk bece Rarns ab idtiag Odi 2 ere th hy nas) Copan ity to preécwirt tothe Ped re lve Co inn = leet 7 rigs asd Dee Protess (louse, Foupth, EiRin, Skt Egicr j Lomb ued a QUESTION Cs) PRESEMITED a G he Gayers By Giidheaw i$ Vows ceberntencie hKeducie tobe : t . =~ . — Elicihler mroie, The Site of North Larolina, | amgeaven pe 7 ne (Pe Sentence before been F Ligible fp Tipolk the staebe gtuse nase Ain Oils © tele A lo gad thnk ob Retaag TO be zucse thy | a pre ine. MC Sire cl Ae ore) oH . i 43 5 Fin; ‘ A a . MY oOwroO Tint A mis Z2Eenrrence AC ey ERA, PP ir ; ‘gre el al ia 2 S : F os, = ; i : da tialye j nih V2 ; : ‘ce [Yoon re wr~ Q PALL Ouse} A C > |e ape 4b. bi eo Now Me VER + atid Earned Tne maeingt merit Nae Merileninuns Te bad 1 Goel hw . : PAY, é ‘ : . j> Le : . Feu bi, AYO er Ee igth adidas pts pecns Aend nasi 06 wey as Due Process Pron iio the Gove rnarSesled i . * = { Z at thet bois (5 Soete ai Gnof ~ 153 Denese Billi I@PGYIA bhanoe ing — the next scehedul ved paleo le Wen! eww derke Pons one eci bh . i u; | t . i dir divert because Tavs unde, Fir Sentence ACH : y J 7 Lettie ai eic RPE i Loe 2 up Fr : Aid Rirole once. a ia 194 Stic wie, Jerntincinun ALT . F f 7 ; (3) Lontinued ‘ QUESTIDN( C$) PRESEATE DP 7 fo. at iL: . Poi: 2 oo : 7 ‘ L \ Wis tt G@ Violating, of th Ped tet oni is Li S Le ishtuhions . roles Ubin , Fepsin en Eig h-Lb titel Fesis dicho, cho Ade Avnvindina curr AS Wreit as Die Prroatlkesse L at Fo bn MA Pi 4 [4 LTRS i é ; 4 . : ° 4 ; Fevitems andthe Bor~Releacec Gopervittiont anid Birole Com4 : > . fs ‘ ’ nodsSéont. Fach-ty. 2 th ia Ceparai$$ioni revise Z§ / an Stes (ep coace —flacementd an MAPPUyoleeerythnee years. Al se, ] hare. b Wen Chie ible Dr rote Sinice V2) aon? The Hireix : . . é ’ . frowns gg, Meh (L2¢ uf dein Se (the Pe

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)

Attorneys

John Edward Butler
John Edward Butler — Petitioner
John Edward Butler — Petitioner