No. 22-674

Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-20
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2023-06-29 (distributed 2 times)
Related Cases: 22-884 (Vide)

Question presented not available.

Docket Entries

2024-07-16
Judgment Issued.
2023-12-06
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available with the Clerk.
2023-11-30
CIRCULATED
2023-11-17
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
2023-10-18
2023-10-18
2023-10-18
Brief of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed (as to 22-674).
2023-06-30
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-06
Reply of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed. (Distributed)
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-03-24
Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
2023-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 24, 2023.
2023-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2023 to March 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)
2023-01-18
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Attorneys

Forty-Two Former Immigration Judges and Members of The Board of Immigration Appeals
Richard W. MarkGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Richard W. MarkGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Christopher J. HajecImmigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus
Christopher J. HajecImmigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus
Lucas Champollion, Brandon Waldon, Masoud Jasbi, Willow Parks, and Cleo Condoravdi
Michael Daniel ReifRobins Kaplan LLP, Amicus
Michael Daniel ReifRobins Kaplan LLP, Amicus
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves
Raed GonzalezGonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Raed GonzalezGonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Amanda Lea WaterhouseWaterhouse Dominguez & Strom, PLLC, Petitioner
Amanda Lea WaterhouseWaterhouse Dominguez & Strom, PLLC, Petitioner
Elizabeth Graber BentleyCivil Rights Appellate Clinic, Petitioner
Elizabeth Graber BentleyCivil Rights Appellate Clinic, Petitioner
Nadia AnguianoFederal Immigration Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
Nadia AnguianoFederal Immigration Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
Ross Alan MillerGonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Ross Alan MillerGonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
National Immigrant Justice Center, American Immigration Lawyers Association, American Immigration Council
Matthew Eben PriceJenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
Matthew Eben PriceJenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
National Immigration Litigation Alliance et al.
Thomas Gregory SpranklingWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Amicus
Thomas Gregory SpranklingWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Amicus
Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin
Christopher John StenderFederal Immigration Counselors, AZ, Respondent
Christopher John StenderFederal Immigration Counselors, AZ, Respondent
Varinder Singh
Saad AhmadSaad Ahmad and Associates, Respondent
Saad AhmadSaad Ahmad and Associates, Respondent