No. 22-674
Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
22-884
(Vide)
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2024-07-16
Judgment Issued.
2023-12-06
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available with the Clerk.
2023-11-30
CIRCULATED
2023-11-17
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
2023-10-18
Brief of respondent Varinder Singh filed (as to 22-884).
2023-10-18
Brief of respondent Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin filed. (as to 22-884)
2023-10-18
Brief of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed (as to 22-674).
2023-06-30
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-06
Reply of petitioner Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves filed. (Distributed)
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-03-24
Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
2023-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 24, 2023.
2023-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2023 to March 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)
2023-01-18
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Forty-Two Former Immigration Judges and Members of The Board of Immigration Appeals
Richard W. Mark — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Richard W. Mark — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Lucas Champollion, Brandon Waldon, Masoud Jasbi, Willow Parks, and Cleo Condoravdi
Michael Daniel Reif — Robins Kaplan LLP, Amicus
Michael Daniel Reif — Robins Kaplan LLP, Amicus
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves
Raed Gonzalez — Gonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Raed Gonzalez — Gonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Amanda Lea Waterhouse — Waterhouse Dominguez & Strom, PLLC, Petitioner
Amanda Lea Waterhouse — Waterhouse Dominguez & Strom, PLLC, Petitioner
Elizabeth Graber Bentley — Civil Rights Appellate Clinic, Petitioner
Elizabeth Graber Bentley — Civil Rights Appellate Clinic, Petitioner
Nadia Anguiano — Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
Nadia Anguiano — Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic, Petitioner
Ross Alan Miller — Gonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
Ross Alan Miller — Gonzalez Olivieri LLC, Petitioner
National Immigrant Justice Center, American Immigration Lawyers Association, American Immigration Council
Matthew Eben Price — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
Matthew Eben Price — Jenner & Block, LLP, Amicus
National Immigration Litigation Alliance et al.
Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin
Christopher John Stender — Federal Immigration Counselors, AZ, Respondent
Christopher John Stender — Federal Immigration Counselors, AZ, Respondent
Varinder Singh
Saad Ahmad — Saad Ahmad and Associates, Respondent
Saad Ahmad — Saad Ahmad and Associates, Respondent