No. 22-6744
Michael Lee Gordon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-procedure sixth-circuit standing supreme-court
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether the Sixth Circuit Court erred in dismissing petitioner's motion as second/successive under 28 USC 2255
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Z,\ whether or not the Stroth Circo] Jo wer Cour $ ecto red by ThAN sterr ng Seah OhcuM Role LO Ces wettons Fe Khe > cul Court of Appeale as second | Success\re as Osc JXSS feotrans « IL) Whether or not rhe Sheth Coreus ] Jower Counts errone ol be transfering PetMioner 5 Motion Yo Dismesr fe She Sixth Crean Cour of Apper Ls C$ second/ Successive QS LSC AASS motions © / — Ee a ee ee
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent