Whether petitioner established prima facie evidence demonstrating countervailing factors excusing him from making his similarly situated Batson-based argument before the trial court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. WHETHER PETITIONER ESTABLISHED PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATING COUNTERVAILING FACTORS EXCUSING HIM FROM MAKING HIS SIMILARLY SITUATED BATSON-BASED ARGUMENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT? ; . , OB WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIR.CUIT COURT OF APPEALS WRONGLY ACCEPTED THE GOVERNMENT’S POST HOC RATIONALIZATION CONCERNING ITS JUSTIFICATION FOR STRIKING JUROR 10, WHILE IGNORING OBJECTIVE FACTORS TO THE CONTRARY? WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIR.CUIT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY _ OVERLOOKING A MATERIAL MATTER OF LAW CONCERNING A BATSON CHALLENGE?