No. 22-6747

Jimmy Wayne Guinard v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression fair-trial jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing vouching
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Trial Judge's labeling petitioner as a sex offender to the jury when he had never been charged with such offenses and was charged with drug offenses violate petitioner's 6th Amendment right to a fair and impartial trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i. Did ial ep te the Tria\ Judge 1 Valoeling, petdhionec QS a Sex OfCendEr To Jury Wher he has neecr had chacyes oF that nature and Was Chacsed woth drag offenses Violate. Pethonecs USC. Mand te Amendment cghts to a fale and impactial trial by Suc? a. Was Trial : 7 . e i Counse| in the Lest case NO, PlI3Z00cRZ0I) OLIHk NefLect we for fathas to object To the i ‘ (isd a ye a erroneous Jury nsteucton \Ste \ alpove and Gec failing To olyect to even one of The eleven Vouching Medents oc The Infremants credibility that occucred ® 3. Can the prosecarh’ yo . Cuhiod Ceplace Physical eviden ~ either lost oc destroyed just te oben < hen re Was ; NYS LO) HU, Did the Proseceurtec , ZOlZ Cases Vivlecle ravenna . ved both COSES The 201\ cn Teal by J ‘INF t0 Laur Ord impache| . Yj wey by Vouching ond Placia Pac (eH behind ‘the credits} Jeeeiesy the stoles belie? Satoh OF The informants in both cases ? 5. Did the Trin| ) ot ayo ‘ Judoe Violate Petitinect a . To Qa fate ond \mpacteal te £cS Aue Process cight motion for g Bish Teel by denying Pektoncts a New tren when The Judge Inecsel€ Sti [ Led before Tria) Theat Prioc bad acts Could Not oi in this Trial ? come (9 e “7 &. Did the Prose curtoe WER Zolloty t a ‘ . & Vielate Petitio 4, a by delilecately introducin . Tlogecs Owe Process oa s cli becate 4Y Introducing unchocged alleged Peioc had acts int 7, was PetcdionesS UiSs&. ge Amuclmert Coruel and unusual Puaishmest) Gnd Usic. INE Amendment Cotght to caval probecton of te lows) Violoted by The Trial Judge sentencing, Pefthioner To Consecutwe Sentences When other Judges sn The Same Courty Sembenced Similar cases TO Concurrent Sentences % . © 8 was he trial Judges Lalure te cecuss herse)€ Sus sponte a Violahen eS peftianec’s 1M Amadment When She. had a Personal interest in petiPiners Cases because She tried both Cases and lod Raowledge 6£ both Petitioners Trials Coming \pefore hee before the Fest Tral oad Sentencing © Paye Tr

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2023)
2022-11-23
Application (22A459) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 23, 2023.
2022-10-26
Application (22A459) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Jimmy Wayne Guinard
Jimmy Wayne Guinard — Petitioner