1. How can a petitioner lose appeal of rights on certain claims due to officials mishandling Court Order?

2. Why should the State enjoy the privilege of asserting procedural misconduct that "suppressed the default rule" when it is their own Constitutional errors in final?

3. How does counsel's silence concerning a due process violation that caused his client's line of defense to be abandoned represent his subject to prosecutions case to a meaningful fuel cut v ex si a. Interests or testing?

4. How does counsel being silent of a constitutional error be excluded? How does counsel being clear in transparent protecting his client's rights or representing his interests?

5. In light of the constitutional errors and XAC 7 can d be confidently return considering all the evidence would there found which a reasonable word guilty me? Broad material prior to aick Should not o, defendant have a right to consensual nature of the subsequent-post-vital plea as being affected the plea?

6. Overarching Matter with ocWWcri Vol.) Does the State's practice of Prime Fundamental principle of Justice?

How can a petitioner raise Fundamental claims to a higher state court when he lost appeal of right on certain claims due to officials' mishandling of court order?