Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Violated Lassegue's rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Violated Lassegue’s rights when it ignored ‘this®. Courts precedent in Kwai Funwong V. Beebe 732 F.3d 1030(9th Cir 2013). See also. Jonhson V. United States, 3:14-cv-753 2016 U.S. Dist. _ LEXIS 81976 2016 WL 4497066 at 6 (M.D. Pa Aug 26 2016). _. And in it’s own circuit Under Schimidt V. Skolos, 770 F. 3d 241, 249 (3d Cir. 2014), Whether the U.S Court of Appeals For the Third ‘Circuit also Violated Lassegue’s rights Under "Barnes V. American Tabacco Co, 161 F .3d 127, 154 (3d Cir 1998)( quoting Kichline V. | Consol idated Rail Corp., 800 F.2d 356, 360 (3d Cir. 1986)) . See also Lake V. Arnold, 232 F _.3d 360, 266-68 (3d Cir. 2000). also . See *"West V. Philadelphia Elec. Co 45 F_.3d 744, 754 (3d Cir 1995). . And Hill v. United States, 180 F Supp. 3d 578, 581 (SD.111. 2016). _ Whether the U.S Court Of Appeals for the Third Circuit violated ‘” ““(Lassegue's) rights when it ignored it’s own Courts precedent in Berry, 715 F, 2d at 981, Cowell v. Palmer Two, 263 F. 3d 286, 292 (3d Cir. 2001). And in Basley v. CMC Real Estate Corp., 923 F, 2d, . 758, 760 (9th Cir. 1991) brought Under 42 U.S.C. (1983). See id. at 755 n. 9 (citing Berry v. Board of Suppervisors of Louisiana State Univ. 715 F.2d 971, 982 (5th Cir. 1983)). And also See... , Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. & Med, Ctr, 165 F. 3d 236, 240 (3d Cir. 1999), And Miller v. NJ State Dept of Corr, 145 F. 3d 616, 618 {3d Cir. 1998), See Haines v, Kerner, 404,.U.S. 519, 520-21, 92, S. . Ct 594, 30 L.Ed. 2d 652 (1972). 2 of 15