No. 22-6764
Michael Ray Davis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-law constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review lafler-v-cooper overruling padilla-v-kentucky statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether United States v. Granados, 168 F.3d 343 (8th Cir. 1999), Has Been Overruled by Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), and Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether United States v. Granados, 168 F.3d 343 (8th Cir. 1999), Has Been Overruled by Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), and Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012). i
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Davis
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent