Did the Illinois courts violate Petitioner's fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal search and seizure when the police seized his cell phone from March 2017 and conducted a second, warrantless search in August 2017?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED J. Did the Dilineis courts vielate Petitioner's fourth Amedmen? Right do be free from illegal Search ard seiture when jhe police seized hie cell phone ftom March 8017 and condvctel a second, warrantless search jn Avg ued B0)97 TT. Did the Lllinig Courts violate Petitioners Lederal and statetory Cig hts fo Speedy Trial oncler the Sixth Amendment and 1A5 LLes 5/103-5 when the trial Court took a Molten to Suppress uncer aolvisern ent for over @ Year (March 219 fo June Aogo) withet 4 Motion to Continve frleaa by either. patty Avring phet psriodl anh with Pelion er objecting iN writing five mes 2 : , I, Oia the Tl lincis Courts vielate fetiioner's Focrteenth Amendment right te ove precese in Shite courts when se Loutt ‘counted delays Clery mort trom March Dot4q to “Jone todo, even where Petitrener id not Cqjvedt any Aeley and objected 4e Aelays? TW. Dia the Lllineis courts o° against precedent sed n both Lllineis and federal courts hat “vader adlyicernent”! delay canact be abtei buted fo a Aehirdantas duck Aelay is unilaterally engaged in by +e tral court 2? | |