No. 22-6778

Mi-in-gun Justin Charette, aka Justin Marshall Critt v. Minnesota

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2023-02-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation custodial-questioning fifth-amendment miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona right-to-counsel self-incrimination suspect-rights
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the prophylactic rules announced in Miranda v. Arizona allow a suspect to request that counsel be present for questioning when the suspect is in custody and custodial questioning is imminent

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED : Whether the prophylactic rules announced in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 . (1966), which protect the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, : allow a suspect to request that counsel be present for questioning when the suspect is in custody and custodial questioning is imminent. i

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-15
Reply of petitioner Mi-in-Gun Justin Charette filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of ServiceOtherMain DocumentProof of ServiceOther
2023-06-01
Brief of respondent Minnesota in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 1, 2023.
2023-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2023 to June 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Proof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of ServiceMain Document
2023-03-17
Response Requested. (Due April 17, 2023)
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 16, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Mi-in-Gun Justin Charette
Anders Joseph Erickson — Office of the Minnesota Appellate Public Defender, Petitioner
Anders Joseph Erickson — Office of the Minnesota Appellate Public Defender, Petitioner
Minnesota
Jacob Daniel Campion — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent
Jacob Daniel Campion — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent
Brian J. Melton — Clay County Attorney Office, Respondent
Brian J. Melton — Clay County Attorney Office, Respondent