Whether the 20-year sentence imposed was legal after the plea bargain agreement for no more than 10 years was approved

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) On A April 9,2012 after all parties approved and signed the plea bargain agreement documents,and Hon.Judge Teresa Hawthorne approved and accepted the recommendation for no more than ten years,was the 20 years sentence legal?. (2)Newly Graduated Appellate: J. Kita,although very noble intentions,did not raise the issue,because criminal law was not his forte,or because he was bullied? (3) The Texas Code Criminal Procedure,article 26.13(a)(2) is very specific,[if] the plea bargain agreement is accepted,and approved by the trial ‘judge all parties are bound by it;including the judge,and it can be attack at any time by the ‘ breached party,to enforced his or her part of the agreement at any time,including by Motion of Nunc Pro Tunc,why then the Trial Court,Appellate Court and Court of Crininal Appeals are refusing to honor petitionars pleas ?. (4) Once the plea bargain document is executed no changes can be made,unless on appeal,Why the courts accepted trial counsel's untruthful affidavits that petitioner change his mind after April 9,2012 ?. (53) There is no indicia that any other plea bargain took place but the one on April 92,2012 back by the R/R page 16 and the plea bargain documents showing the illegal crossed-out or "X" for the ten years,concluding that there was no other,but the tey years recommendation that petitioner agreed why?. (6) Petitioner is entitled to his part of the bargain for 10 years and compensation for the two years illegal incarceration is it ?. (7) Would this the highest court in this country let this injustices keep going?. (vv )