Whether the Ninth Circuit's holding that a defendant is guilty of money laundering conspiracy because he was a 'foot soldier' in a gang and therefore would 'likely know' what other gang members were doing, violates well settled law that people cannot be convicted of conspiracy based on mere speculation and guilt by association?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit’s holding that a defendant is guilty of money laundering conspiracy because he was a “foot soldier” in a gang and therefore would “likely know” what other gang members were doing, violates well settled law that people cannot be convicted of conspiracy based on mere speculation and guilt by association?