No. 22-6793
Robert Loya, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-possession drug-trafficking evidence felon-in-possession gang-affiliation intent-to-distribute sentencing sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is there insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of guilty for Count 1: possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine over 50 grams and Count 2: being a felon in possession of a firearm?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Is there insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of guilty for Count 1: possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine over 50 grams and Count 2: being a felon in possession of a firearm? I. Whether evidence of gang affiliation was unfairly prejudicial and should have been excluded? III. Whether Mr. Loya’s sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release was substantively unreasonable? Oe
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Robert Loya, Jr.
Sandra Eastwood — Sandra Eastwood, Petitioner
Sandra Eastwood — Sandra Eastwood, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent