No. 22-6795
Jacobo Rozo Posso v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-performance criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-malpractice notice-of-appeal post-conviction-relief procedural-default right-to-appeal
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal when requested
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . Posde ‘seeks a writ of certiorari on the following issue: 1. we COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE WHEN HE FAILED 10 FILE THE NOTIGE OF APPEAL WHEN REQUESTED. | | | | : Ij | i | ’ . 1 | | | : ii | ‘ | io ; i Jd | . | i ; | . 1 | pe | | |.
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent