Did the McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) decision embrace the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §1153(a), to the Territory of the State Of Oklahoma?

Question Presented Did the McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) decision, embrace, include within, annex to, the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §1153(a), to the Territory of the State Of Oklahoma by leaving unlawful prosecutions in state courts in place? Did the McGirt 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) decision apply the Major Crimes Act as to its “usual terms”? Making the decision a substantive rule of law. Did the Courts of Justice violate petitioner’s constitutional rights, by not establishing subject matter jurisdiction even though the trial court had the Cherokee Nation Tags, Title to the 2006 Toyota Tundra truck, and the Tribal Membership Cards, CDIB at the time of the crime? Is this conviction and sentence invalid under the law? e . ; ii :