No. 22-6809
Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 404(b)-standard appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-rule evidentiary-issues evidentiary-test judicial-interpretation legal-uniformity rule-404(b)
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is an updated, clear, and uniform test needed for the most common evidentiary issue presented on appeal, Rule 404(b) related issues?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Is an updated, clear, and uniform test needed for the most common evidentiary issue presented on appeal, Rule 404(b) related issues?
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Mohamed Ahmed
Denton Bryan Lessman — Law Office of Denton B. Lessman, Petitioner
Denton Bryan Lessman — Law Office of Denton B. Lessman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent