Was Petitioner's constitutional rights to due-process, as a United States citizen, beneficiary under the Social Security Administration, and former Paralegal, denied?

QUESTION PRESENTED The duty to report and the duty to advise is codified in the United States Constitution, the highest court in the land. Litigation is a contentious matter and there are two sides to.every case. The parties to a case participate fully to represent the interests of their client or for pro se litigants, advocate for themselves, when they cannot find counsel, and this participation is mandated by the United States Constitution to be adjudicated by the Court, not observed as a silent observer. The Judge is considered the Trier of Fact and mediates between the parties to assist in justice. The call of the Judge is one of the highest calls in the land, and it is a call to act. 1. Asa result of the lower court Justice refusing to act to review the actual Settlement documents (or participate), which the U.S. Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit affirmed, was Petitioner constitutional rights to due process as a United States citizen, beneficiary under the Social Security Administration, and former Paralegal denied? PETITIONER: Yes. 2. Was the lower court’s refusal to hear the second conjoined case (from the same transaction and occurrence) also unconstitutional? PETITIONER: Yes.