No. 22-6820
Sergio Moises Ochoa v. Wisconsin
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review compel-witnesses constitutional-interpretation due-process enumerated-rights evidence-rules fundamental-rights judicial-discretion present-defense rules-of-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May courts continue to treat fundamental and enumerated rights as mere guidelines to be discarded when inconvenient?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented The rights to compel favorable witnesses and present a defense are fundamental to our system of justice, and predate our constitution. Yet these rights are routinely subjugated to rules of evidence, and these decisions are most frequently reviewed only for an appropriate exercise of judicial discretion. May courts continue to treat fundamental and enumerated rights as mere guidelines to be discarded when inconvenient? 1
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2023-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Sergio Ochoa
Steven Sidney Roy — Law Office of Steven Roy, Petitioner
Steven Sidney Roy — Law Office of Steven Roy, Petitioner
Wisconsin
John Arthur Blimling — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
John Arthur Blimling — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent