Whether imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release upon revocation of supervised release when the previously imposed term was 10 years is constitutional?

QUESTION PRESENTED The Ninth Circuit failed to apply this Court’s decisions delineating the purpose of supervised release as set forth in Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 709 (2000) and Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, (2007) when it affirmed the district court’s ruling increasing Petitioner’s term of supervised release from ten years to life. Against this background the question presented is: Whether imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release upon revocation of supervised release when the previously imposed term was 10 years is constitutional? ii