No. 22-6825
Richie Lee Edmonds, III v. United States
Tags: controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-history criminal-law drug-distribution due-process federal-sentencing federalism sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a prior state conviction for drug distribution qualifies as a "controlled substance offense" under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b), when the state statute of prior conviction included substances that, at the time of defendant's sentencing for the instant offense, were legal under both federal and state statutes.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prior state conviction for drug distribution qualifies as a 'controlled substance offense' under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Rescheduled.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-07
Reply of petitioner Richie Edmonds, III filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-24
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2023.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2023 to May 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2023.
2023-03-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2023 to April 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Richie Edmonds, III
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent