No. 22-6825
Richie Lee Edmonds, III v. United States
Tags: controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-history criminal-law drug-distribution due-process federal-sentencing federalism sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prior state conviction for drug distribution qualifies as a 'controlled substance offense' under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a prior state conviction for drug distribution qualifies as a “controlled substance offense” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b), when the state statute of prior conviction included substances that, at the time of defendant’s sentencing for the instant offense, were legal under both federal and state statutes. i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Rescheduled.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-07
Reply of petitioner Richie Edmonds, III filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-24
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2023.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2023 to May 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2023.
2023-03-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2023 to April 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Richie Edmonds, III
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent