No. 22-6827

Sandra Rumanek v. Sherry R. Fallon, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts administrative-law civil-rights court-resolution due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-questions petitioner-rights procedural-due-process right-to-be-heard standing
Latest Conference: 2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does petitioner Sandra Rumanek have the right to be heard?

If so, is it incumbent on this Court to resolve these questions of law?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does petitioner Sandra Rumanek have the right to be heard?

Docket Entries

2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-03-08
Waiver of right of respondents Timothy M. Holly, Mary I Akhimien and Matthew F. Boyer to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-03-02
Waiver of right of respondents Louis J. Rizzo, Jr. and Sandra F. Clark to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent David G. Culley to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

David G. Culley
Kimberly A. Boyer-Cohen — Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Respondent
Louis J. Rizzo, Jr. and Sandra F. Clark
Arthur D. Kuhl — RegerRizzo & Darnall, LLP, Respondent
Sandra Rumanek
Sandra Rumanek — Petitioner
Timothy M. Holly, Mary I Akhimien and Matthew F. Boyer
John D. Balaguer — Balaguer Milewski & Imbrogno, LLP, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent