No. 22-6833
James Floyd v. Texas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidentiary-hearing goading mistrial trial-rights
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a goading-style Double Jeopardy violation bar further retrial even where the trial court had granted a mistrial on an independent ground?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1) Does a goading-style Double Jeopardy violation bar further retrial even where the trial court had granted a mistrial on an independent ground? 2) Is Petitioner entitled to an evidentiary hearing when he presents a colorable goading-style Double Jeopardy claim? il PARTIES Petitioner: James Floyd Respondent: State of Texas
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.
2023-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2023)
Attorneys
James Floyd
William Reynolds Biggs — WILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
William Reynolds Biggs — WILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
State of Texas
Andrea Jacobs — Tarrant County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Andrea Jacobs — Tarrant County District Attorney's Office, Respondent