Whether the court erred in failing to grant appellant relief from his sentence enhancement based upon his prior state convictions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED TL, WHETHER THE COURT ERREO IN FAILING TO GRANT APPELLANT RELIEF FRom Hes SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT BASED UPON HIS PRIOR STATE ConuTCTIONS AETER MATHEIS ANVO WHETHER THE Cours RULING CONFLICTS wrTH THE EN BANC DECISION IN HAVES HNO SEVERAL OTHER STXTH CZRCUTT CourT OF APPEALS OECISIONS PETER HAVIS. TL. WHETHER THE couRT E@RED WHEN IT FATLEO To GRANT RELIEF ON APPELLANT'S CLAIM THatT HIS CONSPIRACY CONVICTION DOES Not QUALIFY For CAREER OFFENDER ENHANCEMENT UNDER UL. 6.6. G 4BLi,