No. 22-6846
Christopher L. Corn v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure invited-error judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can an appellate court use the invited error doctrine to preclude review of a plainly erroneous sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum sentence authorized by Congress?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can an appellate court use the invited error doctrine to preclude review of a plainly erroneous sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum sentence authorized by Congress? i
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Christopher Corn
Becky Kurz — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
Becky Kurz — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent