No. 22-6846
Christopher L. Corn v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure invited-error judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can an appellate court use the invited error doctrine to preclude review of a plainly erroneous sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum sentence authorized by Congress?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can an appellate court use the invited error doctrine to preclude review of a plainly erroneous sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum sentence authorized by Congress?
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Christopher Corn
Becky Kurz — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent