No. 22-6852
Marvin Charles Gabrion, II v. United States
IFP
Tags: adverse-witness attorney-client-privilege attorney-representation civil-procedure conflict-of-interest formal-appearance legal-ethics professional-conduct professional-responsibility standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an attorney who provides legal advice to counsel of record without filing a formal appearance in the case can have a conflict of interest if the attorney simultaneously represents an adverse witness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can an attorney who provides legal advice to counsel of record without filing a formal appearance in the case have a conflict of interest if the attorney simultaneously represents an adverse witness, or do rules apply only to attorneys who file formal appearances?
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-06
Reply of petitioner Marvin Gabrion filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2023.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2023 to May 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2023.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2023 to April 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Marvin Gabrion
Monica Foster — Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Petitioner
Monica Foster — Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent