No. 22-6853
Joshua Seekins v. United States
Tags: appellate-review commerce-clause criminal-law criminal-possession due-process federalism harmless-error interstate-commerce jurisdictional-issue second-amendment sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of ammunition solely because it crossed state lines at some point before it came into the defendant's possession
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of ammunition solely because it crossed state lines at some point before it came into the defendant’s possession. (2) Whether a district court’s boilerplate statement that an alternate guidelines range would not affect its sentencing decision makes any Guidelines calculation error per se harmless on appeal. @)
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-06
Reply of petitioner Joshua Seekins filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2023.
2023-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2023 to May 22, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-21
Response Requested. (Due April 20, 2023)
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
2023-01-30
Application (22A682) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 11, 2023.
2023-01-26
Application (22A682) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 9, 2023 to March 11, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Joshua Seekins
Kevin Joel Page — Federal Public Defender's Office, ND of Texas, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Federal Public Defender's Office, ND of Texas, Petitioner
Tobias Samuel Loss-Eaton — Sidley Austin LLP, Petitioner
Tobias Samuel Loss-Eaton — Sidley Austin LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent