Whether Courts have discretion to hold pro se litigants to a strictly following Fed.R.Civ.P. while ignoring represented litigants' late filings and while using its orders to avoid the Rules itself

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , L ‘Whether Courts have discretion to hold pro se litigants to a strictly following : i Fed.R.Civ.P. while ignoring represented litigants’ late filings and while using its orders to avoid the Rules itself. 2. Whether Courts have discretion to retain jurisdiction, continue adjudicating a case _ and issuing orders, and dismissing with prejudice, after striking the Original Complaint entirely months before dismissal and prohibiting all Amended Complaints, and therefore, proceeding without an operative Complaint. 3. Whether a judge who was the lawyer for an organization with a policy identical to those in question in this case, and who, with his wife, is currently employed by that same organization, and who, in previous cases challenging policies identical to those held by the organization, ruled in a way that was favorable to his organization’s policies despite the law, has the appearance of bias in this instant case under 28 U.S.C.§455. 4. Whether a pro se Complaint—to which Defendants responded in a way that shows they understand what it was about and where no Defendant asked for a more definitive statement—states a claim upon which relief can be granted and therefore meets Fed.R.Civ.P.8 requirements even though it is long and contains many exhibits supporting its factual statements.