No. 22-6869
Daniel Earl Genson, III v. Kansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-principles criminal-law criminal-punishment due-process fourteenth-amendment fundamental-rights mens-rea strict-liability
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the absence of mens rea from a felony offense that criminalizes passive, otherwise innocent conduct without proof of notice while subjecting individuals to severe criminal punishment violates the Fourteenth Amendment?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the absence of mens rea from a felony offense that criminalizes passive, otherwise innocent conduct without proof of notice while subjecting individuals to severe criminal punishment violates the Fourteenth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2023-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2023)
2022-11-29
Application (22A468) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until February 25, 2023.
2022-11-22
Application (22A468) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 27, 2022 to February 25, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Daniel E. Genson, III
Clayton James Perkins — Capital Appellate Defender Office, Petitioner
Clayton James Perkins — Capital Appellate Defender Office, Petitioner
Kansas
Dwight Rlyn Carswell — Kansas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Dwight Rlyn Carswell — Kansas Attorney General's Office, Respondent