Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals abused their discretion on jurisdiction and erroneous application of 28-usc-1367(c)(3) on constitutional-claims,whether the District Court abused discretion by denying 42-usc-1983 complaint at screening stage,whether the District Court erroneously applied 28-usc-1915 and denied right to pursue civil-rights-claim

QUESTION PRESENTED ~ I. Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals Abused there : Discretion on its Original and Supplemental Jurisdiction by an : . erroneous application of Section 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) on Earls . ; Constitutional Claims by not considering those claims in a 42 U.S. C. § 1983 petition. ; : II. Whether the United States District Court Abused it's Discretion ; : , by denying Earls 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Complaint at the ; ' Screening Stage of the process for failure to State a Claim, when ~ sO ~ a Constitutional Claim with Evidence was presented where the defendants ~ . . ‘violated. : III. Whether the United States District Court erroneously applied the ; Law pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. § 19154 and denied Farls his Right to pursue a Civil Rights Claim. . : 1