No. 22-6913

In Re Robert B. Read, Jr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto habeas-corpus rules-of-evidence sixth-amendment speedy-trial subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-03-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court have implied subject-matter jurisdiction to try the petitioner for the indicted felony offense?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the United States Constitution allow the trial court implied subjectmatter jurisdiction to try Petitioner for the indicted Felony One Offense? 2) Did the Collin County, Texas 366th Judicial District Court deprive Petitioner Read of his sixth Ammendment Right, as guaranteed by the United States Constitution, to compel witnesses in his favor under the "Plain Error" : Rule? 3) Did the Collin County, Texas 366th Judicial District Court’violate Petitioner Read's right to a Speedy Trial for all indicted charges by operation of law? 4) Did the Collin County 366th Judicial District Court abuse it's discretion by allowing the state to utilize Texas Rules of Evidence In violation of Ex Post Facto law (U.S. Constitution, Art. 1 Sec. §9) Resulting in harm & Prejudice to Petitioner (Defendant) Read? rey ; : Vv PAGE -3

Docket Entries

2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-01-19

Attorneys

Robert B. Read, Jr.
Robert B. Read, Jr. — Petitioner
Robert B. Read, Jr. — Petitioner