No. 22-6916
Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review appellate-waiver constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-claim plea-agreement plea-bargaining summary-enforcement
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether courts can summarily enforce an appellate waiver to bar motions to vacate unconstitutional convictions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented for this Court’s review is whether a court can summarily enforce an appellate waiver to bar motions to vacate convictions for which the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment of conviction. i
Docket Entries
2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)
2022-12-16
Application (22A537) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 2, 2023.
2022-12-13
Application (22A537) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2023 to March 2, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla
Darlene Bagley Comstedt — Law Office of Darlene Bagley Comstedt, Petitioner
Darlene Bagley Comstedt — Law Office of Darlene Bagley Comstedt, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent