Is the failure of a District Court and a United States Court of Appeals to order instant dismissal of the immediate case for lack of Article III Standing a sufficient type of extraordinary circumstance to compel correction by Mandamus?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED i l. Is the failure of a District Court and a United States Court of Appeals to order instant dismissal of the immediate case : : for lack of Article III Standing a sufficient type of extraordinary circumstance to compel correction by Mandamus? . 2. What gives the lower Courts of the Territories the authority : to dismiss their duty to establish Article III Standing? : 3. Is Petitioner correct in claiming that His Due Process was negated? . ; i ‘ . . . t . . i ; a ae RELIEF soucut : oo ee oo Petitioner is entitled to immediate relief and petitions this Honorable Supreme Court for this Great Writ directed to the United States District.Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division, Magistrate Youlee Yim You, Judge Michael W. Mosman, Judge Marco A. , Hernandez of the District Court, The United States court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Circuit Judge Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judge Gabriel P. Sanchez, and Northern District of Illinois Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow commanding these respondents to immediately dismiss the action against Petitioner for absence of Article III. Standing. . ' UNAVAILABILITY OF RELIEF IN OTHER COURTS : : , The Courts have failed to make a finding of facts showing proof of the basis of their Jurisdiction, even when challenged by Petitioner | (See attached copy of Transcripts,