Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a 'actual innocence' defense theory

ESTIONS PRESENTED | TO Ts the Petitioner entitled +a AC defense theory’? 7 Tits the. Fetitioner entitled to AN standard of — TeVieWof his claims on they merits? . oe LITT. the Tetitoner entitled to Over Come Paced. | LrAL default doto the Fit Cactof trial Counefand RRA Counse | iIneffetives? | IM. Ts the. fet tioner ENtitled to AN Evidentia ry Hearing do to the_fact tne. Fetithoner file. AN Brief lA yering — theinef fective Asslance ©9 trial Counse| Ancl PER. A.Counse | C ' | TAGLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Quéstions Pasenteds+ > . . : ; : ° ar TAvle of Contents. ser wo 8 oe oly Tabi Ff Citations 2 6 6 * ee eee EMI Statementofuris diction cere we wee ee Dit Moostitubuing | Statutory ace ° * ew ee OX Orderio Que shin a ne ~er7 ‘Xj StatementoMtne Chasen oe + Oni SuInATY ofthe Argument ec = pads enn | | “Sal Argument cere Be veteseagy a QP Consititutuinal Violations -oe oe . 23 Be. ComPlict vwith the OistrictCouct . : : BS @ ty REASON. « cy os eee oo, 30 Ota Ceddlysion — . “ess | RePortand Re Commadatinn denied -...