No. 22-6942
Kwame Burrell v. Willis Chapman, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-counsel appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process guilty-plea judicial-discretion right-to-counsel state-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings
DueProcess Takings
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court fail to protect the petitioner's fundamental due process right to substitute appellate counsel after the original appellate counsel withdrew and the trial court refused to appoint substitute appellate counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO PROTECT PETITIONER’S FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE APPELLATE COUNSEL SUBSEQUENT TO HIS GUILTY PLEA WHEN ORIGINAL APPELLATE COUNSEL WITHDREW FROM REPRESENTATION AND THE TRIAL COURT REFUSED TO APPOINT SUBSTITUTE APPELLATE COUNSEL. US CONST, AMS VI, XIV; CONST, 1963, ART 1, §§ 17, 20? 1
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent Willis Chapman, Acting Warden to respond filed.
2023-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Willis Chapman, Acting Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent