No. 22-6947

Alexander Samuel Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1001 due-process entrapment false-statements fbi-investigation government-fabrication materiality statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a statement made to FBI agents can be material and knowingly false under 18 U.S.C. §1001(a) when the criminal enterprise underlying the statement was completely fabricated by those same agents

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED As Justice Ginsburg warned in Brogan v. United States, 18 U.S.C. §1001(a) “arms Government agents with authority not simply to apprehend lawbreakers, but to generate felonies, crimes of a kind that only a Government officer could prompt.” 522 U.S. at 409 (Ginsburg, J., concurring in the judgment). This warning was made manifest in the prosecution of Alexander Samuel Smith, whose conviction is based on his failure to recall the truth amongst the web of lies spun by government investigators and undercover contractors. The question presented is: Whether a statement made to FBI agents can be material and knowingly false under 18 U.S.C. §1001(a) when the criminal enterprise underlying the statement was completely fabricated by those same agents. i

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Alexander Samuel Smith
James W Kilbourne Jr.Allen Kilbourne + Stahl, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent