No. 22-6950

Beatrice Newsome v. Festiva Resorts Real Estate Holdings, LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: deed-transfer due-process homeowners-association maintenance-fees property-rights resort-fees resort-property state-jurisdiction takings
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why didn't any of the previous courts made no mention our deeded property?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

THE QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Why didn't any of the previous courts made no mention our deeded property?. The main issue is that Ellington @Wachesaw East Plantation sold our property without our consent and failed to compensate us with a fale and reasonable amount that could have settled this issue long ago. What makes this resort think that they can collect from us over 21 years of maintenance fees, renovation fees assessment fees, exchange fees etc. and when they decide to sell our property for 9million plus we would accept this small check in return. We bought this property as a nest egg to turn to when we got older. We agreed to buy this property because of the statement it would last us for the rest of our life with a claus of "survivorship" as long as we kept up with all the dues and fees that the resort would request.This never happened If our case is denied for its worth it would jeopardize ali future owners of properties with legally certified deeds. It would set a president that any time any large resort or organzation with prestige and money could come and take anyones property at any time without legally purchasing it from its original owner without their knowledge and consent. 1 Beatrice W. Newsome : EarlL. Newsome (Cont'd QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW) Equally important for review is the Homeowners currently having a claus that as long as their workers with the resorts work with them in another state although they live ina different state them are exempt from not living in the state that the owners live. All of my respondents live in North Carolina and we live in South Carolina, Therefore | failed to prove that they live across state lines while doing business with us. ! am divistated that these presidents and CEO have everything figured out on how to get over on our every day citizens who are working every day to make ends meet. We are left with nothing of value to look forward to that we worked hard to preserve. Please look into these Homeowners Association dealings with the public. Please help us , with our case.. Thanking you in advance. Earl L. Newsome & Beatrice W. Newsome 2

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-05
Petitioner complied with order of May 15, 2023.
2023-05-15
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 5, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent Festiva Resorts Real Estate Holdings to respond filed.
2023-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Beatrice Newsome
Beatrice Newsome — Petitioner
Beatrice Newsome — Petitioner
Festiva Resorts Real Estate Holdings
H. Catherine ClaussenFestiva Real Estate Holding, LLC, Respondent
H. Catherine ClaussenFestiva Real Estate Holding, LLC, Respondent